Sarah's horror show

I saw you on Hannity...

Let us get it straight right now
I am not accusing you of setting the gunman in AZ off
I am accusing you of bad taste
I am denouncing your offensive, violent, "Hate Rhetoric" which has not stopped, and you will not apologize for

You claim there is no violent intent to your military style tactics,
Yet while you used the inflammatory terms and graphics, you simultaneously placed the crosshairs of your rifle over a caribou's heart and executed it in cold blood on National television.

You implied violence, and then committed a violent act, with a smug defiant look on your face the whole while.

And now on Hannity
You admonish the left and claim the finger pointing has to stop. and then you label the gunman as a liberal in almost the same breath.

Hypocritical bitch

You went on to say that if not for the liberal's double standards, they would have no standards at all...

The delightful look on your face as you said this says it all
You think you are clever!

Oh My GOD!!!!

Believe me Sarah
You are not

Trust me
I have standards

Why do you think I find you so offensive?


Sarah will not apologise for her hateful inflammatory tactics
How presidential!

Next she will be asking us to "Target" all those who criticize her rampant stupidity

Meanwhile, Glenn Beck illustrates the Tea Party's blatant and dangerously moronic hypocrisy:

Guilty of inciting MURDER?

Sarah Palin "targeted" Congressmen and women under the cross hairs of a gun and asked her followers to "take them out"

Gabriel Gifford responded:

We need to realize that the rhetoric, and the firing people up and ... for example, we're on Sarah Palin's targeted list, but the thing is, the way she has it depicted, we're in the cross hairs of a gun sight over our district. When people do that, they've got to realize that there are consequences to that action...

Now Sarah wants you to believe she is not complicit...

Of course Sarah was not asking anyone to commit violence, she was asking for votes, and this incident, for her, was an enormous and inconvenient coincidence...

Or was it?

Perhaps her political tactic to use a gun sight to emphasize the idea of "targeting" certain congressmen and women for "termination" was not only outrageously insensitive and ill conceived, but downright stupid.
Especially when you consider that she was making plans to hunt down and shoot to death a live caribou on national television at the time.

Stupid, stupid, stupid.

She also contends that it was an oversight, leaving up the web pages encouraging people to "target" (complete with images of cross hairs) members of congress, after the election.

Oversight or not?
Either way

Stupid, stupid, stupid.

She claims that it was unforeseeable that there might be people out there who were mentally unstable enough to take the idea seriously...
This comment alone should demonstrate once and for all that this woman is much too ignorant and simple minded to lead or manage anything beyond the complexity of a lemonade stand.

Yes this is a free country, and speech is still relatively free as well, and Sarah Palin is free to illustrate her politics, her tactics and her agenda as she pleases.
However, there is such a thing as going too far.

She shouted "FIRE" in a crowded theater and she should now pay the price, politically, and legally.